Friday, March 25, 2011

Cervical Ectropion And Not Pregnant

"Terminal crisis of capitalism? LOCATION POLICY

For some years respected economists from different countries tell us about the terminal crisis of capitalism. Ramón García reminds us in a substantial essay.

Capitalism is a production machine, unable to stop because he lives change, internal dynamics is revolutionary, continues to disrupt all social relations, including that he himself created. This machine production creates wealth, prosperity and welfare, where to install or take root. The pursuit of riches, the insanity in the monopoly, move the machinery of the glut, ruling out any possibility of rational control of supply and demand. Selfishness, more and more selfishness, ambition, more and more ambition, greed, more and more greed, that's the formula for success and ruin of the capital. The essence of the crisis of capitalism is overproduction or over-accumulation. Today we have too many assets to buyers seeking too few, too much money in search of a few profitable investments, too many workers in search of a few jobs, too many banks on the lookout for a few impoverished savers and depositors, and so on., Etc.

wealth concentration grows without limit to a few "chosen" while poverty is spreading like a scourge of humanity. The new Forbes magazine list of people richest in the world, exposes the booming fortunes of the holders of more than U.S. $ 1,000 million. The list is headed by the richest man in the world still Mexican, Carlos Slim, worth U.S. $ 74,000 million. The president of Chile, Sebastián Piñera, is part of the select list of 1210 men who possess fortunes in excess of U.S. $ 1.000 million. This bonanza for the rich is the result of the prevailing economic model in the world today has a population of approximately 7.000 million people. This means that if the mobster Carlos Slim give away 1 million dollars of his fortune, every parishioner of the planet (regardless of age), yet that gentleman would be a millionaire.

terminal crisis of capitalism is a deep structural crisis (over-) imposing "solutions" (financial bubbles, real estate, etc..) That end up being trigger the collapse of global capitalism. Ramón García Rodríguez lays bare a process, whose main thrust through the plethora of riches, sinks to the capitalist empire. Strange way to collapse!


Tacna, March 25, 2011
EBM



financialization

(Initial Sketch)

The current dominant system (Crime and marginal) has gone through successive stages through periodic cycles of crisis-recovery-boom stagnation. In 1929 he suffered a very serious crisis that led to the II-GM. In that war the U.S. went from country to country debtor creditor. After minor cycles was losing its productive capacity, and is now the most indebted country in the world. In 2008 he suffered this general crisis which can not be recovered. Why?

While still dominated the industrial capital, Marx, in The Genesis of Capital , 1867, said

Public debt has come to give impetus to
corporations, traffic of
negotiable of all kinds, the agio;
in short, to the lottery of the bag and bancocracia


This bancocracia , government banking, became a reality to the 800 with the emergence of financial capital (predominance of bank capital in its merger with the industrial capital), a process discussed by Lenin and Rosa Luxemburg.

Lenin said their main economic traits: emergence of monopolies, domination of the financial oligarchy, dominated the export of capital, the emergence of monopolistic groupings international territorial division of the world. Thus arose the "parasitic capitalism and rentier" ( Imperialism, 1916 ) Luxemburg

studied The Accumulation of Capital (1912-1916), an issue that Marx had left unfinished. He warned that "Marx's economic theory is inseparable from the idea of \u200b\u200bglobal capital" brought to light the internal exhaustion of the system (the accumulation is only possible in half capitalist ") so he was forced to fight natural economy, introduction of market economy, anti-peasant economy, international borrowing as an instrument of domination, protective tariffs, militarism as a field of capital accumulation. Why

Why can not this build your own? For the same human activity on the job. Man always tends to produce more than required for daily sustenance. The experience led him to produce more in good times, bad times to resist. And to produce more to compete with other producers.

To produce more, in the current system intensified working hours that workers face in their struggles for the rights. This leads to invention and development of machines and machine system, convert all, including agriculture, industrial processes. And there is the man-machine conflict.

With the machine not only there is more wealth but more misery. The machine moves to the worker. So came the fighting machine (Luddites) and the "right to work." It was Marx who discussed the background of this claim: "In the first draft Constitution, written before the days of June, still contained 'droit au travails' , the right to work, the first formula, clumsily stated , which summarizes the revolutionary demands of the proletariat. (...) The right to work is, in the bourgeois sense, a contradiction, a petty pious wish, but behind the right to work is the power over capital, and behind the power of the capital, ownership of the means of production, its submission to the associated working class, and consequently, the abolition of wage labor as both capital and their mutual relations "(1850) In his preface of 1895, Engels notes that this work "is proclaimed for the first time the formula on which the parties unanimously workers of all countries in the world condense their demand for an economic transformation: the appropriation of the means of production by society . And "Here is formulated, then, for the first time, the thesis that the modern working-class socialism differs sharply from all the different shades of socialism feudal, bourgeois, petty, etc., as the confused community property of communism and communist utopian spontaneous labor.

This is an aspect of the matter. The other aspect is discussed in Paul Lafargue Right Sloth (1880) After discussing how the concept had been disfigured Right to Work by moralists of the bourgeoisie, in the Appendix demand: "Do you want to see mocked, reviled, your dogma of work, so proud you show? ". After a review of texts of Herodotus, Plato, Xenophon, Aristotle points out that provided that" if every useful could run without collaboration, or by itself, its functions, and that just as the masterpieces of Daedalus moved of themselves or the Vulcan tridents spontaneously undertook their sacred work, if for example the launch of the weavers weave alone, the shop manager and would not need any more help or more slave master. "He concludes that" Aristotle's dream is our reality. Our machines, encouraged by the fire, equipped with steel members, tireless, prolific and inexhaustible play meekly, by themselves, their sacred work. But nevertheless, the genius of the great thinkers remains dominated capitalist the prejudice of the employee, the worst of slavery: not yet understand that the machine is the redemption of mankind, the god will rescue a man from sordidae arts (crafts) and wage labor, in a word God will give you leisure and freedom. "

is this more evident now than ever. Mechanization, automation, robotics, production increases to levels unimaginable even just decades ago. On the one hand, there is a crisis of overproduction, and inventories not are buyer. Why? Because this overproduction has its counterpart in rising unemployment. The fewer workers can acquire assets and consumption. On the other hand, the machine (because backlog) does not produce surplus value. Thus the capitalist has to centralize production shifting to other capitalists of their country, other countries worldwide. Globalization ! wealth is concentrated in few hands, poverty spreads both hands. How the system faces this reality? With financialisation .

in their internal relationship, the financial sector now dominates the production system. Given the low profitability of the productive system (less relative surplus by increased automation), financial system requires first shok inflation (as in the first government of current president), and then permanent inflation dropper. And inflation is the indirect tax suffered by workers in general. After imposing high interest rates for the entire financial intermediation (by the mere fact of having a debit card and become the subject of this high interest.)

No government can face this reality today as the Washington Consensus has imposed the Central Bank autonomy, autonomy apparent domestic, for truly national bank is controlled by the pair of WB-IMF gold

As unemployment is rife there is low productivity growth, hence the capital go to the financial market (where directly dominates transnational banks) and less into production (which has to deal with wage claims, at least). Finances dominate over production. It openly system parasitic rentier.

As the system requires no capital ties, require the privatization of public goods and bargain prices. If previously advertised the "nationalization" is now advertising the "privatization" to get "better service." Public enterprises, public hospitals, public educational institutions (schools, colleges, universities), all fell to the privatization of financialization.

Not only that. Fall into "the lottery bag "of resources saved: pension funds, insurance companies, investment funds. Since the worker receives no pension. Although listed more, their pension fund is their" investment "of which only the interest charged at the end. That is The deferred salary is gone, and as the contract is temporary, does not receive holiday, overtime, night work, annual leave. Only he is the nominal wage and not eight-hour day but ten to twelve hours, if it is used. And has increased the rate of living, raise the pension age.

economic and monetary policies, with the promise of the "most profitable" have led the "bubbles", such as real estate, a large captive market business. The financial share is several times larger estate to pay rent, mortgage and goes to the "eviction" as he goes chases the loser in foreclosure.

Thus, the system has passed initial liberalism (freedom, equality and fraternity) with production-productivity expressed in money, neoliberalism (production suspended), expressed in interest on interest (financial bubble), because the money does not money does not increase the money but through production.

But now all economic activity is through the financial intermediary, is held by corporations.

It is time that the machine is the redeemer of mankind. For that, the machine has to be ownership. This is accomplished by "leisure and freedom." The creative leisure break. Freedom as the consciousness of necessity.

The work-rest ratio is regulated with the workday in two parts, one for daily survival, another background combined for a "sabbatical." Every so often there is a year off (together with the background combined) for retraining, career change, field trips, and others.

In antiquity, Pliny the Elder (SI 23-79) noted the decline of the slave system by its insoluble contradictions. He declared that

Latifundio
Italiam lose.


more and more analysts now conclude that financialization is the death sentence of the system, its insoluble contradictions. And declare that


Financialisation lost the Empire


Of course, as they see eternal beneficiaries, no system automatically disappears. Its setting only expresses the economic determinism. But depends on the political volition to go away sooner or later.

this twilight We are living in our own reality. The electoral process Presidential is a clear example of this. So from April, the central task

PREPARE OWN ORGANIZATION OF SOCIALISM IN PERU!



March 25, 2011

Thursday, March 24, 2011

Network Adapter Averatec 1000

THESIS anti-imperialism view


(March 24, 2011)
By: Miguel Aragón

José Carlos Mariategui The Chair has organized for Analysis and Discussion Discussion of the Anti-Imperialist Viewpoint Thesis, to be held on Thursday 24 March.

The investigator Gustavo Pérez Hinojosa to publicize the event has been reported by several mail groups the text of this thesis, and commented on the sidelines. It seems a very positive move that helps the better development of the conversations of analysis, discussion and propaganda of the new ideas.

At the end of the text of the thesis is reproduced Editors Note which is included in the edition of the Complete Works series JCM.

Editors Note the foot of the Anti-Imperialist Viewpoint Thesis
.- (*) Thesis submitted to the First Latin American Communist Conference (Buenos Aires, June 1929). Has been reproduced from the Latin American Revolutionary Movement (Edited by Correspondence Sudamericana). The same version appears in Volume II of the work of Martinez de la Torre (pp. 414 to 418). Was read by Julio Portocarrero in circumstances that are struggling "anti-imperialist struggle and tactical problems of the Communist Parties of Latin America." After his reading, the Peruvian delegate said: "Comrades, he writes comrade José Carlos Mariategui when formulating his thesis on anti-imperialism, by analyzing economic and social status of Peru ...". Editors Note.

In reviewing this letter, we find that the editors make a mistake of omission.

It is true that the thesis was submitted to the Communist Conference held in Buenos Aires, but fails to mention what was the main objective for writing the thesis Mariátegui.

us review briefly the background leading up to the dissertation mentioned.

June 1927: Review of methods and concepts
Mariátegui
stated that "the repression of June (1927) among other effects is to promote a review of methods and concepts" in the ranks of Peruvian socialist movement, movement which at that time was in its definition phase.

After concluding in early June 1927 the publication of articles formed the essay on The Problem of the Earth, in which he analyzes in depth the problem of political power in Peru, Mariátegui days after leaving prison began the preparation of three important political documents in which precisely expresses the above "Review of methods and concepts."

The first document of this rethinking was the prologue to the book Tempest in the Andes by Luis Valcárcel. The preface was written in June 1927 and published in the book possibly in October of that year. The second document I began to write at that time was future program principles, Socialist Party of Peru whose paper was presented at the Meeting of Barranco a year later, on 7 October 1928. Mariátegui not improvise the core text of the program, but that it was reviewing and editing from June 1927 until early October 1928. The third document, also drafted in June 1927, was National Land Policy Principles, published in World Magazine on 1 July. This while the overall program progress is already being developed, he became the Programme Peruvian Agrarian Socialism.

October 1928: Programming Principles

in point 9 of the Programming Principles presented at the meeting on 7 October Barranco 1928, Mariátegui proposed the following: "Attached to the draft program published thesis on indigenous issues, the economic situation, the struggle against imperialism, that after the debate of the sections and amendments in the text enter the Central Committee definitely be made at the first Congress of the Party. "(This paragraph has been inexplicably omitted the Programming Principles published in Complete Works Collection JCM).

May 1929: Four Theses Program Attached

Seven months later, in May 1929, Mariátegui finished writing the above three theses (On the Indian question, the economic situation and the struggle against imperialism), and additionally added a fourth thesis on the class action. The Meeting

Barranco, or possibly at a later date, it appears that he was commissioned to develop the said Ricardo Martinez thesis on "the economic situation." We came to this assumption, because the Peruvian delegation that attended the Latin American Trade Union Congress of Montevideo (May 1929) carried and presented an extensive document on the economic situation in Peru written by Ricardo Martinez, a document that was released years later in the Third Volume of their works. Four Theses

annex to the program developed by Mariátegui were: 1 .-

thesis was the first Economic Situation. Mariátegui seized the opportunity presented with the editors of the magazine La Sierra to do an interview to present their current views on the Economic Situation. The magazine went public a month later, in June 1929.

This first thesis Policy, first developed Mariátegui new aspects of economic development scheme, and on the other side is bound up with who, in those years, denied the possibility of capitalist economic growth in society Peru, and therefore denied the need for growth of the proletariat and the possibility of socialist revolution in Peru. Asked

"Historically, it is not possible to establish a formal capitalism?" Mariátegui responds: "A formal capitalism is already established. Although not yet achieved the liquidation of feudalism and our mediocre incipient bourgeoisie is unable to do it, Peru is in a period of capitalist growth. "

To the question" Does the economy of the shore establishment socialist economic forms? "JCM says:" In the As a capitalist, the economy of the coast creates the conditions for socialist production "

And finally to the question" Accomplished historically liberal economic stage, is not fatally advents socialism? "JCM says:" The coming political socialism does not imply perfect compliance exact liberal economic era, according to a universal journey. I've said elsewhere that it is very possible that the fate of socialism in Peru is in part to perform, according to historical rates accompanying certain tasks capitalist theory "

2 .- The second thesis was Point Vista Anti-Imperialist . In this thesis disclaims Mariátegui policy fields who denied the possibility of socialist revolution in Peru. Starting the thesis

Mariátegui stated as follows "How can assimilate the situation of Latin American republics to the semi-colonial countries? The economic status of these republics is, without doubt, semi, and its capitalism grows and, consequently, the imperialist penetration has to accentuate the character of its economy. "

Pointing policy goals scored" The anti-imperialism for us, does not constitute or may constitute, itself, a political program, a mass movement suitable for the conquest of power. Anti-imperialism, admitted he could mobilize the side of workers and peasants, the bourgeoisie and petty bourgeoisie nationalist (and have flatly refused this possibility), does not negate the antagonism between classes, do not remove their difference of interests. "

concluded with a strong statement "in conclusion, we are anti-imperialists because we are Marxists, because we are revolutionaries, because they are opposed to capitalism to socialism as adversarial system, named to succeed him, because in the struggle against foreign imperialism fulfill our duty of solidarity with the masses revolutionary Europe. "

3 .- The third thesis was Outline Indian Problem. In this thesis Mariátegui disclaims fields who reduced it to an ethnic problem, educational, moral, or administration, and denied the economic, social, and political problem.

Locating the role of the indigenous movement in the socialist revolution said "An Indian revolutionary consciousness may take to form, but once the Indian has endorsed the socialist idea, the will to discipline, tenacity and strength in few proletarians of other means can outdo. "

(Delegates who attended the conference in Buenos Aires communist misrepresented Mariátegui this thesis, first merged with two other texts by Hugo Pesce and Eudocio Ravines, and changed its name by putting The Problem of Race in Latin America, as arbitrarily appears Collection Complete Works of JCM. Mariátegui responded tit for tat to the arbitrariness of the delegates, and published the original version of his thesis in Amauta N º 25 August 1929.)

4 .- The fourth thesis was Background and Development of class action. Mariátegui advocated the role of the nascent proletariat in Peru's history from its beginnings to the completion of its stage of definition. This theory has to be the first history of the Socialist Tradition and necessary starting point for studying the history of the Peruvian proletariat, and participate with determination in the commemoration of the centenary of the socialist movement Peru next year 2018.

* * * Four Theses

attached to the program were four political thesis that supported the program principles. In the Four Theses Mariátegui develops an updated analysis of social classes in the Peruvian reality, while exposing the role played by each of the classes in the socialist revolution in Peru. Reviewing the four theses together will better understand the proposal Mariátegui about the driving force, main force and partners in each stage of socialist revolution in Peru.

Between October 1928 and early April 1930, the Programming Principles and the Four Theses were attached to the program under study and debate among socialists Peruvians who were preparing for the First Congress of the Socialist Party of Peru.

Mariátegui After the death of the task of the First Congress was abandoned because of rising militant Peruvian socialism were not the height of the proposed task. To date, elapsed more than 8 decades, there remains the task of adopting the core documents: Programming Principles and the Four Theses Adjuntas.

welcome the initiative of the Chair Mariátegui to organize and convene this important Discussion. The analysis and discussion of the Anti-Imperialist Viewpoint thesis are more necessary now, to define fields and set resolutely to the new versions of bourgeois nationalism that once again, as in the 1920's, are in full swing to oppose claims to the Peruvian socialism. TacnaComunitaria

Free Magic Card Maker Mac

REDISCOVERING THE WHOLE PARTY II



November 24, 1928 at No. WORK 2 Fortnightly information and ideas that the Publishing Society Amauta published between November 1928 and September 1929, test broadcasts Mariátegui: Press doctrine Information and Press. This is a document of vital importance because, along with some details of the press, doctrinal or informative, provides lots of lights to the thesis "the first mass party and ideas of our entire republican history."

The auroral years experience Peru's socialism, the Marxist tradition affirms where to start in political work. Lenin, summarizing the experience of Marx - Engels said: newspaper is not just a propagandist and a collective agitator, but also a collective organizer. turn, JCM in 1923 said: "Communications are the nervous tissue of this humanity internationalized and solidarity" . That statement in the century of globalization of the economy has more reason. Since late last century, electronic communications confronts us with new scenario, the global scenario of class struggle. Scenario in which some questions should make us think: Can you resolve the first question (Where to begin?) In political work as did Lenin and Mariátegui in the last century? What results ephemeris leads to the main vehicle in political work? What is the main purpose of a political cult and how the class organized?

In the last century, China's cultural revolution generated a great debate limited geographically and theoretically. In this century, the whirl of events leaves almost no time to recover from previous events. "Communications are the nervous tissue" of this turmoil and social networks are the great battle scene between two worlds. In this battle, a world that refuses to succumb and another that tries to assert, as the operation is brain workers, Seseras of that "humanity and solidarity internationalized." Press

doctrine Information and Press says: "As information, especially in our case, can not be understood in the narrow sense chronicle of events, but mainly as a chronicle of ideas. "We are being proposed, which was standard life of Jose Carlos: The battle of ideas! The class struggle has priority as the operation the brain of the historical subject of social change: the working class. Engels on one of his latest reflections on balance of fifty years of struggle for socialism since the 1848 revolution says "If they have changed the conditions of war between nations, not least have changed the class struggle. The time of surprise attacks, of revolutions carried through by small conscious minorities at the head of unconscious masses, is past. Where it is a complete transformation of social organization have to intervene directly the masses, must have understood themselves and what it is, why give their blood and lives. This has taught us the history of the last fifty years. And for the masses to understand what to do, it takes a long and persevering work. This work is precisely what we are doing now, and with a success that adds to the desperation of our adversaries. " [1] To paraphrase Engels can say that they have changed the conditions of war between nations, not least have changed the class struggle in the XXI century.

not to extend too. We want to emphasize some parts of the trial of Jose Carlos Mariategui we copy below.

1. on the relationship between orthodoxy and heterodoxy: It is, therefore, a party committee. But neither is a heterogeneous committee.

2. Role of intellectuals in the party and social movement: doctrinal line is a function of party. Intellectuals as intellectuals, can not be associated to establish it. Your mission in this regard must be content with the provision of critical items, research and debate.

3. Front policy in intellectual work: Plus, if it has proved impossible, on this basis too extensive, a review of doctrine, not in the same case, a news magazine. And this is the character of "Monde", which presents information as a weekly literary, artistic, scientific, economic and social development. Journal of combat, newspaper affiliation, because it fights against all reactionary forces and trends, but not match because represents the cooperation of many writers and artists, caring only in opposition to the current regressive and less intensity and effectiveness, adherence to the efforts to create a new order.

4. Individual's role in the process: Barbusse is, by his background, his talent, for his work, a large vote of confidence in all revolutionary sectors. Mariátegui And we would say, is distinguished by its great ability to encourage and gather around the project-undeclared 1926 - socialist intellectual values \u200b\u200bof different creed and training but with the same social conscience.

5. Distinction between the party elite or party of the working class party's newspaper has an inevitable limitation: the audience and a cast of their own. For foreign readers with its policy, but generally has no interest controversial. This favors an industrial press release entitled, while information and therefore neutral, is actually the most effective and insidious propaganda of ideas and facts and the most irresponsible conservative mystifying ideas and revolutionary events.

6. The art is in the working class (workers and peasants) their vital support, so the leading edge is not if its representatives do not represent the social movement. Do not forget the maxim of the young Marx "The emancipation of the working class must be the work of the working class itself" .

Press Publishing Press Doctrine and José Carlos Mariategui information is part of a series of works that, in our view, will give greater insight to the understanding of the thesis "the first mass party and ideas of all our republican history. " We also invite connoisseurs and divers of libraries that make us with documents that contribute to the goal set in this section of TacnaComunitaria Blog.

Tacna, February 24, 2011

EBM



DOCTRINE PRESS INFORMATION AND PRESS [1]

With its large weekly "Monde", Henri Barbusse resumed, in a sense, the experiment of "Clarté" first time. The steering committee of "Monde" is composed by Einstein, Gorki, Upton Sinclair, Manuel Ugarte, Unamuno, Leon Bazalgette, M. Morhardt and Leon Werth. There is therefore a party committee. But neither is a heterogeneous committee. All you are great writers who have problems today with a gesture more or less the same, similar, their differences in temperament and discipline. All are men of the Left, in the general sense of this classification, perhaps a bit abstract.

"Monde" would not have been possible without the test series which meant the existence of "Clarté" since its emergence as an international body of thought, until its transformation into a doctrine of extreme left magazine, "La Lutte de Classes ". The experiment Clarté, such as the International frustrated intelligence has proven impossible to obtain the cooperation of a very broad, and therefore highly nuanced leftist intellectuals, a well-concerted action doctrine. Unamuno could not subscribe, in many ways, the thought of Barbusse, a member of communism, just as Morhardt that it would be unwise to require strict adherence to the ideas of Upton Sinclair in "The Book of the Revolution." But Morhardt, which contributed to the process of the responsibilities of the Great War and vigorous documented testimony, this side is in close contact with colleagues of the Steering Committee, the wise parecidamente Einstein that if spent on other intellectual disciplines, not military in the ranges of Marxism, instead openly collaborating with the revolutionaries in the struggle against imperialism. The line is a function of party doctrine. Intellectuals as intellectuals, can not be associated to establish it. Your mission in this regard must be content with the contribution of critical items, research and debate.

But if it has proved impossible, on this basis too extensive, a review of doctrine, not in the same case, a news magazine. And this is the character of "Monde", which presents information as a weekly literary, artistic, scientific, economic and social development. Journal of combat, newspaper affiliation, because it fights against all reactionary forces and trends, but not match, because it represents the cooperation of many writers and artists, caring only in opposition to the current regressive, with lower intensity and effectiveness, adherence to the efforts to create a new order.

party's newspaper has an inevitable limitation: the audience and a cast of their own. For foreign readers with its policy, but generally has no interest controversial. This favors an industrial press release entitled, while information and therefore neutral, is actually the most effective and insidious propaganda of ideas and facts and the most irresponsible conservative mystifying ideas and revolutionary events. Absolute lack

ago, so, give life to newspapers for information, led to a wide audience, to assume defense of civility and order again, relentlessly denouncing the reaction and its methods and bringing together, in a methodical work, the more advanced writers and artists. These newspapers are susceptible to progressive adaptation to the industrial, administrative discretion if the criterion is imposed on teachers, and reformist deviation, if gradually absorbed the democratic tide, their resentments and anti-revolutionary bias. But, of all sorts, are a company need to undertake. Without worrying excessively about their risks.

The presence of Henri Barbusse, honest revolutionary, a great heart and intelligence, the direction of "Monde" is a guarantee that this magazine, however liberality allowed in the choice of his colleagues, knows how to maintain its initial line. Barbusse is, by his background, his talent, for his work, a large vote of confidence in all revolutionary sectors. The extreme left of her fellow Clarté ", under whose direction and responsibility is fulfilled the second phase of this experiment, reproaches her Insufficient Marxism. But this is an issue and tried, with unquestionable competence, Russian criticism. Barbusse intellectual formation, increases the value of its accession to the revolutionary cause, increases the scope of its break with social vice.

The survey "Monde" has opened on proletarian literature, prompted widespread debate internacional2, should the extent that from the outset has been reached, the non-sectarian, non-partisan in this newspaper. In this survey involved intellectual range that goes from André Breton and the revolution "surreal" to Paul Souday, a critic of the "Temps". "Monde" does not admit that proletarian literature is an empty word. It has its own points of view. But this will not stop wishing and cause a thorough discussion, consult the most varied opinions. Only then is it possible to a newspaper appeal to large segments of the public.

Hispano-America has a prestigious Representation on the board of Le Monde. " Thus the name of Manuel Ugarte as the great Don Miguel de Unamuno, who gives so uplifting and magnificent example of fidelity to the duties of intelligence, but found no sympathy and respect among the peoples of English, "Monde" is intended to achieve a fruitful eco awareness Hispanic continent.

The above considerations are relevant to the explanation of our experiment Amauta "and" work. "

Among us Amauta is increasingly geared towards the kind of magazine doctrine. "WORK" that a part is an extension the work of Amauta, on the other hand tend to kind of newspaper reporting. Its function is not the same. Since information, especially in our case, can not be understood in the narrow sense of chronicle of events, but mainly as a chronicle of ideas, "WORK" has respect for his audience, who want the widest possible-our newspaper, the biweekly for the moment, a weekly broadcast just so consent, is aimed at all manual and intellectual workers, "integral obligations illustration of the issues and contemporary movement, a magazine known doctrinal. This explains perfectly that unbonded to the current Romain Rolland acaudilla with such eminent moral and intellectual authority, we have published in the 'first issue of this journal the last chapter of Romain Rolland on Tolstoy and his work, and that our successive numbers, fulfilling our duty honestly popularization and information, perhaps accentuate this liberality, especially when it comes to opinions and topics that include: easy to host, in the mainstream press, despite their right to public attention.

NOTES:

1 Published in "Work", No. 2, Year 1, page 2.. Lima, November 21, 1928.

2 See, in No. 1 of "work" The opinions of André Breton, Luc Durtain, Leon Werth, Waldo Frank, André Franco, Vandervelde and Unamuno.



[1] F. Engels, Introduction to the 1895 edition of The Class Struggle in France from 1848 to 1850 of Karl Marx. TacnaComunitaria

Monday, March 21, 2011

50th Birthday Cakes For Men

STATEMENT BY THE WORLD WATER DAY



March 22 of each year marks the World Water Day, in our country and especially in the Tacna region, this should call us to reflect on the following problems: FIRST


That Tacna population should practice better water culture, also in agriculture should be banned forever gravity irrigation, and mining use sea water to achieve a sustainable use of freshwater. SECOND


Special Project Tacna That is definitely canceled. In its place should be created Autonomous Water Authority, where are represented the social, public and private Tacna Region. THIRD


To establish a comprehensive management plan and use of water resources in the Tacna Region. This plan should be considered as a priority the construction of dams, reservoirs, canals, driving major and minor irrigation technology infrastructure to implement, avoiding losses due to evaporation, leakage and waste fresh water at sea, thereby achieving full optimization of water use by basin. FOURTH


Amendment of the Water Resources Act and incorporate a statement of the inviolability of the waters in the basin headwaters.

FIFTH
That EPS Tacna improve quality standards of drinking water distributed to the population, as established by the Regulation of Water Quality for Human Consumption from the Directorate General of Environmental Health (DIGESA) DS N º 031 -2010SA

Tacna, March 21, 2011 BOARD






Ildelfonso Malaga Portugal Dimas Eyzaguirre, Edgar Bolaños Marin
President, Sec Organization Communications Sec